Maya Dashboard
Total number of institutions made MDC Targets
88
Total number of concrete targets
1761
Number of targets by status of completion
52% In Progress
47% Completed
Total number of targets by type
Qualitative
Quantitative
In Progress
Completed
Number of Targets by Thematic Areas
Digital Financial Services
1
Indicators Dashboard
â–¶
â–¼
Total number of access points per 10,000 adults nationwide
Primary Metric
Papua New Guinea (2026)
39.80
Zambia (2012)
1,073.00
Ivory Coast (2018)
773.84
Malawi (2011)
735.00
Burkina Faso (2018)
507.13
Lesotho (2018)
369.03
Tanzania (2014)
94.66
Ghana (2015)
36.83
Togo (2018)
221.58
Kenya (2015)
218.00
0
3,045
6,090
9,135
12,180
15,225
â–¶
â–¼
Total number of branches per 10,000 adults at a national level
Primary Metric
Zambia (2012)
268.00
Malawi (2011)
228.00
Papua New Guinea (2026)
1.03
Seychelles (2018)
50.60
Honduras (2019)
15.30
Tanzania (2014)
0.27
Morocco (2015)
2.46
Tunisia (2018)
22.04
Sao Tome and Principe (2018)
20.58
Tonga (2017)
2.00
0
54
107
161
214
268
â–¶
â–¼
Total number of ATMs per 10,000 adults at a national level
Primary Metric
Zambia (2012)
629.00
Papua New Guinea (2026)
48.00
Malawi (2011)
276.00
Seychelles (2018)
82.50
South Africa (2013)
2.93
Namibia (2014)
0.60
Tanzania (2014)
0.62
Uganda (2015)
0.49
Tunisia (2018)
30.67
Jordan (2017)
28.00
0
126
252
377
503
629
â–¶
â–¼
Total number of agents per 10,000 adults at a national level
Primary Metric
Ghana (2014)
13.03
Ivory Coast (2018)
773.84
Papua New Guinea (2026)
1.80
Burkina Faso (2018)
507.13
Lesotho (2018)
369.03
Tanzania (2014)
93.77
Togo (2017)
221.59
Rwanda (2017)
6.50
Zambia (2012)
176.00
Liberia (2018)
164.14
0
197
394
591
787
984
â–¶
â–¼
Percentage of administrative units with at least one access point
Primary Metric
Brazil (2016)
100.00
Mozambique (2013)
49.20
Indonesia (2014)
100.00
Malaysia (2016)
100.00
Ghana (2014)
100.00
Tanzania (2014)
100.00
Thailand (2013)
100.00
Uganda (2025)
100.00
Burundi (2015)
100.00
Kenya (2015)
100.00
0
20
40
60
80
100
â–¶
â–¼
Percentage of total population living in administrative units with at least one access point
Primary Metric
Brazil (2016)
100.0%
Mozambique (2013)
72.1%
Indonesia (2014)
100.0%
Malaysia (2016)
100.0%
Ghana (2014)
100.0%
Tanzania (2014)
100.0%
Thailand (2013)
100.0%
Uganda (2025)
100.0%
Burundi (2015)
100.0%
Belarus (2014)
100.0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
â–¶
â–¼
Percentage of adults with at least one type of regulated deposit account
Primary Metric
Seychelles (2018)
220.06
Kenya (2016)
40.50
South Africa (2012)
73.00
Namibia (2018)
131.83
Costa Rica (2023)
101.70
Morocco (2015)
85.00
Belarus (2014)
100.00
Malaysia (2016)
94.00
Sao Tome and Principe (2025)
—
Ghana (2015)
94.81
0
44
88
132
176
220
â–¶
â–¼
Percentage of adults with at least one type of regulated deposit account, female
Primary Metric
Seychelles (2018)
187.5%
Uganda (2025)
40.6%
Namibia (2018)
97.7%
Malaysia (2016)
93.0%
Argentina (2017)
80.1%
Fiji (2017)
56.8%
Timor-Leste (2016)
52.0%
Mexico (2018)
45.9%
Costa Rica (2023)
49.1%
Lesotho (2018)
46.7%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
â–¶
â–¼
Percentage of adults with at least one type of regulated deposit account, male
Primary Metric
Papua New Guinea (2017)
58.0%
Seychelles (2018)
191.8%
Angola (2018)
111.0%
Namibia (2018)
103.0%
Malaysia (2016)
94.0%
Zimbabwe (2018)
82.1%
Fiji (2017)
68.5%
Argentina (2017)
79.6%
Mexico (2018)
48.5%
Jordan (2018)
66.2%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
â–¶
â–¼
Number of deposit accounts per 10,000 adults
Primary Metric
Jordan (2020)
—
Russia (2017)
46,419.00
Malaysia (2016)
30,738.00
Costa Rica (2023)
30,258.56
Thailand (2012)
25,237.50
Argentina (2015)
13,895.00
Fiji (2015)
—
Honduras (2019)
13,376.00
Philippines (2016)
7,446.00
Samoa (2018)
17,283.46
0
27,000
54,000
81,000
108,000
135,000
â–¶
â–¼
Percentage of adults with at least one type of regulated credit account
Primary Metric
Papua New Guinea (2014)
4.7%
Samoa (2018)
0.0%
Tanzania (2013)
3.4%
South Africa (2012)
56.0%
Argentina (2015)
46.8%
Mongolia (2014)
38.0%
Malaysia (2016)
41.0%
Senegal (2013)
41.0%
Morocco (2015)
39.0%
Mexico (2012)
27.5%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
â–¶
â–¼
Percentage of adults with at least one type of regulated credit account, female
Primary Metric
Papua New Guinea (2017)
1.2%
Argentina (2015)
42.9%
Costa Rica (2023)
45.2%
Malaysia (2016)
39.0%
Mexico (2018)
29.2%
Russia (2016)
33.0%
Honduras (2018)
0.0%
Ecuador (2020)
12.0%
Sao Tome and Principe (2025)
11.2%
Timor-Leste (2016)
2.0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
â–¶
â–¼
Percentage of adults with at least one type of regulated credit account, male
Primary Metric
Papua New Guinea (2017)
2.2%
Costa Rica (2023)
54.8%
Argentina (2015)
51.1%
Malaysia (2016)
44.0%
Mexico (2018)
33.3%
Russia (2016)
30.5%
Honduras (2019)
20.2%
Ecuador (2020)
14.0%
Palestine (2016)
11.7%
Fiji (2020)
9.6%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
â–¶
â–¼
Number of loan accounts per 10,000 adults
Primary Metric
Sao Tome and Principe (2025)
21,871.00
Costa Rica (2023)
15,006.58
Argentina (2015)
8,380.00
Malaysia (2016)
8,242.00
Tanzania (2013)
337.71
Mexico (2012)
—
Mongolia (2014)
3,801.00
Morocco (2015)
3,918.00
Paraguay (2010)
1,434.24
Brazil (2015)
3,503.80
0
4,374
8,748
13,123
17,497
21,871
Policy Profile Dashboard
Policy Profile Response Overview
77% Yes
23% No
23% No
Yes (147)
No (44)
Responses by Question
Yes %
FID.1 - Was the AFI Core Set published?
66.7%
FID.2 - Were additional indicators to AFI Core Set published?
100%
FID.3 - Was a demand-side survey conducted?
100%
DFS.1 - Regulator has mandate for the entire payment system?
100%
DFS.2 - Are there regulations ONLY for mobile channel?
50%
FIS.1 - Is there an official definition of financial inclusion?
100%
FIS.4 - Is there a financial inclusion taskforce/council?
83.3%
FIS.6 - Has there been a diagnostic study for the financial inclusion strategy?
100%
CEMC.1 - Is there specific regulation on financial consumer protection...?
81.8%
CEMC.1.a - …or is the general consumer protection regime applicable?
100%
CEMC.2 - Do they apply to all financial service providers?
100%
CEMC.3 - Is there an institution in charge of consumer complaints?
100%
CEMC.4 - Is there an institution in charge of enforcing financial consumer protection?
100%
CEMC.7 - Do regulations determine minimal standards for written contracts?
100%
CEMC.8 - Is there price transparency regulation?
100%
CEMC.9 - Is the regulator involved in consumer education?
100%
FINT.1 - Is there an AML/CFT regime?
100%
FINT.1.a - Is there a national ID system?
85.7%
FINT.2 - Was there a FATF risk assessment?
100%
FINT.5 - Is there simplified KYC for low-risk products?
100%
FINT.6 - Has there been a Mutual Evaluation of the proportionate regulation?
100%
1 - Policy on Interoperability of DFS
100%
SMEF-Cat-01 - Is there an MSME Development act / law / regulation?
100%
SMEF-Cat-02 - Is there an MSME Development masterplan / National blueprint / Framework?
100%
SMEF-Cat-03 - Is there an agency or coordinating body tasked to promote MSME sector development?
100%
SMEF-Cat-04 - Is there an agency or coordinating body tasked to consolidate MSME data, including demographics, economic and financial indicators of MSMEs?
100%
SMEF-Cat-05 - Is there an agency or coordinating body tasked to promote MSME access to finance?
100%
SMEF-Cat-06 - Is there an agency or coordinating body tasked to coordinate assistance from ministries and agencies to assist MSMEs?
100%
SMEF-Cat-07 - Is there an agency or coordinating body tasked to provide financial and non-financial assistance to MSMEs?
100%
SMEF-Cat-08 - Is there an agency or coordinating body tasked to develop policies for MSME development?
100%
SMEF-Cat-09 - Is there an agency or coordinating body tasked to develop and prescribe a national MSME definition?
100%
SMEF-Cat-10 - Does your country have an MSME definition framework?
100%
SMEF-Cat-12 - Is there a single MSME definition framework adopted across all government agencies?
100%
SMEF-Cat-13 - Does the single MSME definition framework have a legal basis?
100%
IDFS-02 - Has the DFS interoperability policy / vision document indicated above been adopted by the Board / senior management of your institution?
100%
IDFS-04 - Is the DFS interoperability policy/vision document backed by a regulatory framework?
100%
IDFS-06 - Do you have in place mechanisms for clearing and settlement of financial transactions from the interoperable payment platform within your jurisdiction?
100%
IDFS-13 - Are eligibility criteria for participants to the payment system (or interoperable platform)Â readily available?
100%
IDFS-15 - Does the legal framework in your jurisdiction prohibit monopolistic practices?
100%
IDFS-17 - Does the legal framework provide mechanisms for handling complaints and disputes between payment services providers and consumers?
100%
IDFS-18 - Are there provisions for data protection (privacy and data security)?
100%
IDFS-19 - Are there provisions on pricing and conditions for offering financial services to users?
100%
IDFS-20 - Is the pricing regulated by the state or by the Central Bank?
100%
IDFS-23 - Is the payment platform in your jurisdiction connected with (or can be connected to) other infrastructure for cross-border payments?
50%
IDFS-24 - Does the system have a business continuity plan?
100%
IDFS-25 - Does your system comply with international standards?
100%
IDFS-36 - Do you have a financial literacy program for consumers?
100%
FINT.25 - Does your country have a deposit insurance scheme?
33.3%
FINT.25.a - Does your country implement the International Association of Deposit Insurers (IADI) Core Principles?
100%
IGF.2 - Is your institution addressing climate change in its strategic goals?
83.3%
IGF.3 - Does your country have a green finance taxonomy?
100%
IGF.5 - Does the central bank or financial regulator of your country collect and/or disseminate data/statistics relating to climate change or green finance?
100%
IGF.8 - Has your institution enacted regulation to enable mobile payment platforms to provide adaptation and resilience mechanisms
50%
IGF.12 - Does the financial sector follow any Environmental Social Governance (ESG) Standards in your country?
66.7%
IGF.14 - Has your institution issued Environmental and Social Risk Management (ESRM) Guidelines?
100%
IGF.15 - In the response to the economic crisis following the global COVID-19 pandemic, has your institution considered any green elements in the response policies?
100%
IGF.16 - Has your institution updated regulations or came up with interim policies to promote digital financial services during the COVID-19 crisis?
100%